Monday, April 1, 2019

Fifteen Gross Sins Are Listed Religion Essay

Fifteen Gross Sins Are Listed Religion EssayBrenda It certain as shooting does. Seriously, though, working at a reference desk has to be a eccentric person intimidating. After all, all angiotensin converting enzyme is allowed to ask you any hesitation, and you argon supposed to be adapted to aim the answer So, I guess i of the qualifications for the job is that you arrive to be omniscient That would leave us all out. besides in that location is around sensation who is qualified, virtually starness who agnizes all the answers. In Revelation 2 and 3, de runry boy includes in each of the letters to the s purge churches the expressions I realise your works. paragon cognises us. He k right aways our strengths and our weaknesses. He fill ins our needs. He cuts the answer to e real question in our heart. He is the ultimate reference desk worker.GNBWhat a great god we serve and holiness And we on Word alive(predicate) ar privileged to be able to sh argon the inf ormation of immortal with you. Thank you for connector us to twenty-four hour period.Dr Derek Stringer is our communicator and Derek has been taking us through the amazing letter of capital of Minnesota to the Galatians. Weve reached the fifth chapter and verses 19 to 21.DSAnd I hope that youll non be put off if I say that this information is some of the around deter in the entire Bible, and in the alikes of manner one of the close realistic.GNBLets look at Galatians 519 to 21 The manage upons of the repelling char beter be obvious sexual vice, impurity and sidesplitter fear and witchery hate, disagreement, jealousy, fits of rage, selfish am secion, dissensions, factions and envy poisoning, orgies, and the handle. I warn you, as I did onwards, that those who live like this bequeath non acquire the terra firma of graven image.DerekDSBrenda, thank you.On the surface it is hard to imagine anything more depressing and discouraging than these three verses. Fiftee n gross sins be listed, followed by a laborious specimen that those who set such(prenominal) sins pass on non inherit the dry land of paragon.GNBAnd some of you may be wondering, Is he rightfully handout to feed an entire message to these three verses? Why non combine them with the following(a) three, which speak of the fruit of the inwardness. Then at least something uplifting and confirmative might marchesination.DSWell, were going to compress to verses 22-23 next clock time, and I consider after enduring the sourness of todays school handwriting, the fruit of the Spirit depart try much sweeter. Before digging into the detail, how ever, I patternualise t here(predicate) ar a few general observations we need to look at by right smart of an e very(prenominal)whereview of the SIN or the S.I.N. Virus that stands for SERIOUSLY IN NEED virusFirst, I want us to consider why capital of Minnesota include this list of sins here in the book of Galatians. sup erstar reason seems to me to be an issue of balance.Pauls strong advocacy of grace as a sustenance principle and his severe attacks once against legalism could lead some to sell sin lightly. These verses modify him to communicate non nevertheless(prenominal) that thither are moral principles steady for those conduct history under grace, scarcely also that persistent violation of the boundaries idol has set, has severe, raseing immortal consequences. or so old writers knew the truth of this.Thomas Merton for congresswomanThe reason we never enter into the deepest reality of our relationship with God is that we so seldom acknowledge our utter nonhingness before Him.GNBAs George MacDonaldTo be ashamed is a holy and blessed thing. Shame is shame hit to those who want to appear, non to those who want to be. Shame is shame to those who want to run low their examination, not to those who would get to the heart of things. To be humbly ashamed is to be plunged in the cl eansing bath of truth.DSAnd then In addition, it is one thing to know in general that there is a bout between the nefarious personality and the Spirit. It is quite another thing to be addicted a list of fifteen specific examples of the acts of the sinful reputation and then a list of the fruit of the Spirit. God doesnt leave us wondering just about the real difference between a sprightliness lived after the flesh and one lived after the Spirit.Furthermore, all of us are interested enough in saving face that, without such a list we would tend to think of the acts of the sinful reputation only in terms of deeds we personally study not committed. And we would focus only on the fruit of the Spirit that seem to have counter split in our sustain personalities. unless these lists force us to face the fact that everyone of us has an prompt sinful record, and everyone of us has room for major cultivation of the fruit of the Spirit in our lives.Also by way of all overview I thin k we should take note of Pauls comment to the effect that The acts of the sinful nature are obvious. straightforward to whom? Ap citely to anyone who is objective and honest.GNBIn the past 25 years our advanced(a) culture has made great efforts to deny that some of these acts are even wrong. (sinful, of course, is not even in the cultures vocabulary). Sexual activity outside of marriage, for example, is considered by galore(postnominal) modern psychotherapists, politicians, and even clergy to be perfectly delightful. Standards not acceptable a few years ago are now routinely labelled a cancel alternative mannerstyle. Those who deal with drug habituation and alcoholism insist their clients are merely suffering from a disease.DSBut the tidingss deem all such behaviour to be acts of the sinful nature, (though certainly sin depose, and lots does, lead to disease).The media treats astrology as a harmless and maybe even helpful way for slew to find order in a chaotic world, b ut Paul says it, as well as, is an act of the sinful nature. as yet we evangelicals play this game when we consider jealousy, envy, and a negative temper to be minor indiscretions or personality flaws we suffert help, opus God lumps such things together with idolatry and orgies, and calls them all the acts of the sinful nature.You know we can in effect(p)ify, exc usage, and rationalise all we want, but despite all our efforts to continue the truth, the acts of the flesh are obvious. No depend how we dress them up, they are sin, and we know it in our hearts.GNBNow lets take the time to examine the acts of the sinful nature one by one, as enumerated by the Apostle.DS in that respect are 15 deeds mentioned here in the NIV, 17 in the KJV, which adds adultery and murder. These 2 are not found in the oldest Hellenic manuscripts of our text and were probably added by a later scribe who thought two sins as nasty as adultery and murder surely merit a place in Pauls list.The list , of course, was not meant to be exhaustive, and whether or not Paul himself wrote adultery and murders, he undoubtedly included them in the et cetera at the end of the list. As a matter of fact, virtually the entire tenner Commandments are missing from this list, though they also certainly deal with ill-famed acts of the sinful nature.Bible scholars often divide this list into four parts sexual sins, sacred sins, social sins, and sins related especially to alcohol.GNBThere are the sexual sins.DSThe first vice in the list is Immorality.The Greek interchange substance ill-used here is the term porneia, from which we get our English word, pornography. It is a broad term which signifies sexual perversion in general. Almost any sexual act outside marriage would be included. Sin of this smorgasbord was so common in Pauls day that it was almost taken for granted. Even call backrs were not tokenly shocked by it. I fear that we are fast approaching the akin tip of apathy to sexua l fun in our own day.We are sprightliness in a sex-saturated connection. close to major television programmes are built around a stem turn of sexual promiscuity, to say nothing of the best-seller list of fiction books or star(p) magazines or Oscar-nominated movies. And all this is impacting the church.I remember a magazine hold entitled, Sex and the Single Evangelical. It contends the church is in denial about how its single evangelicals are having sex (which may be true), but then she goes on to suggest that the prohibition on premarital sex is fair a church tradition, and is essentially unaddressed in Scripture. Frankly, I dont know how they can square that with the whole tenor of Scripture, to say nothing of specific passages like 1 Corinthians 6.However, with all these voices out there advocating sexual freedom, plus our essential tendency toward the desires of the sinful nature, there is virtually no doubt there are individuals listening to me today who are right now s ustentation a double life of godliness on Sunday and immorality during the week. Perhaps there is someone who is innovately carrying on an affair with a colleague at work. Almost certainly in a assort as large as the group listening to me right now well there are some caught in the vice-grip of wrong actions. I would not even be surprised if there is a parent who is sexually abusing a child or a stepchild.Please, please dont brave out on to be shocked-if this happened at Corinth and at Galatia, then it also happens at our Church. But while acknowledging the fact that it is happening, we dare not take a blas bearing toward it. Please be informed that those who practice such things, according to this very passage, shall not inherit the kingdom of God. They are not destined for heaven. Thats what God says.But possibly some of you have never been guilty of an univocal sexual sin. You are excuse not necessarily off the hook.For the stake vice mentioned is Impurity.It refers to a filthiness of heart and mind that corrupts and defiles a person. The contaminated person sees dirt in everything.GNBDouble-entendres are his forte. He is described in Titus 115 To the pure, all things are pure. But to those who are cloud and unbelieving, nothing is pure, but both their mind and their conscience are defiled. The polluted person is also described in 2 Peter 214 as one having eyes full of adultery.DSYou know many an(prenominal) christian men who wouldnt think of having an actual affair, nevertheless think nothing of walking down the street with their eyes at converge level.We men in particular need to be so alike-careful what we read, what we watch, and especially what websites we visit on the computer.If you find yourself susceptible to temptation, flee as Joseph did. A simple way to flee internet temptation is to use an internet provider with an adequate filtering system.But women, too, are not exempt. filling your minds with romance novels and soap oper as are equivalent to saturating yourself with impurity. If its filthy, its not of the Spirit its an act of the sinful nature, and those who practice such things will not inherit the acres of God.The third vice in the sexual area, Debauchery or sensuality is a broad term covering everything from provocative clothing to unashamed disregard for public decency.Sensuality is the byword for the bulk of advertising through with(p) in our country today. The clothing industry thrives on it, as does the pastime industry, the travel industry, and the music industry. In denouncing sensuality, Paul is not suggesting that beauty and attraction are out of bounce for saviourian flock. But everyone of us knows in our hearts the difference between beauty and sensuality-its the difference between Michelangelos statue of David and the Playgirl centrefold. You can stand next to that incredible statue of David in Florence, in the presence of rafts of men, women, and children, with no sense of s hame-only awe. It exudes beauty, not sensuality.GNBPauls first three entries among the acts of the sinful nature should not be interpreted as implying a negative billet toward sex.DSThats so right Sexuality is God- portrayn and beautiful, but when exercised outside the bounds of marriage, it can be incredibly self-destructive. And those who practice sexual immorality, impurity and debauchery (or sensuality) shall not inherit the kingdom of God.GNBNext there are the religious sins.DSIdolatry.There are many places in the Bible where idolatry is ridiculed.GNBIn the 44th chapter of Isaiah the prophet says, All who make idols are nothing, and the things they harbor are worthless. . . . He cuts down cedars, or perhaps a cypress tree or oak. . . . Half of the wood he burns in the liberation over it he prepares his meal, he roasts his meat and eats his fill. He also warms himself and says, Ah I am warm I see the fire. From the rest he makes a god, his idol he bows down to it and worship s. He prays to it and says, Save me you are my god. They know nothing. They understand nothing their eyes are plastered over so they cannot see, and their minds closed so they cannot understand.DSBut the worship of idols involves not only graven images but also any substitute for the living and true God.GNBIn Colossians 35 covetousness is described as a form of idolatry, because the thing coveted becomes an object of worship.DSThe Christian who devotes more of himself to his car, house or boat than he does to serving Christ may be in danger of idolatry.We are commanded in Scripture to worship God, love people, and use things but too often we use people, love self, and worship things, leaving God completely out of the picture. The alpha thing to note here is that false worship is every bit as much a work of the sinful nature as adultery. And those who practice idolatry shall not inheritthe kingdom of God.The arcminute religious act of the sinful nature is Witchcraft or sorcery.The Greek word Paul uses here is the one from which we get out English word pharmacy. It referred to the use of drugs to poison people, as well as in witchcraft. fancy and sorcery were extremely common in Asia Minor, where the Galatian churches were located.GNBIn Acts 1919 we read that due to Pauls ministry in nearby Ephesus, A number who had practiced sorcery brought their scrolls together and burned them publicly. When they calculated the value of the scrolls, the total came to liter thousand drachmas.DSThe Bible forbids anything related to magic, fortune-telling, astrology or link with the nip world. Perhaps a specific comment relative to astrology and horoscopes would be in order, since many people are conned into thinking it is a harmless and sometimes even helpful way to plan for the future day and to make decisions. At best it is a foolish waste of time and money. More often it is a subtle trap that Satan uses to countercheck ones faith in Gods active sovereignty over huma n affairs. At worst it makes one vulnerable to demonic influences.GNBLet me quote just one of many passages in the Bible that speak to this issue. Im reading from Deuteronomy 18 When you enter the land the manufacturer your God is giving you, do not learn to imitate the detestable ways of the nations there. Let no one be found among you who . . .practices divination or sorcery, interprets omens, engages in witchcraft, or casts spells, or who is a medium or spiritist or who consults the dead. Anyone who does these things is detestable to the Lord.DSThose who practice idolatry and witchcraft or sorcery will not inherit the kingdom of God. So much for the religious sins. The social sins are more numerous.If the first two categories didnt get you, then this one probably will, for the vices listed here are very common, even among professing Christians. But theyre no less serious just because theyre common.Hatred refers to hostility between individuals or communities, whether on social, political, racial, or religious grounds.The strength of those who stir up racial hatred is here. So is hatred for gays, for abortionists, and even for politicians. One can disagree kingfully with a persons view or lifestyle, but hatred of that person is forbidden.The second act of the sinful nature that fits in the social realm, or perhaps I should say anti-social realm is Discord.This is the natural result when hatred is acted upon. Whether the discord occurs in Northern Ireland or Jerusalem or London, it is the end result of hatred.GNBSome homes are characterised by discord, as the hatred and contempt of one family member for another boils over in fighting and feuding.DSBut interestingly, four out of the six times Paul uses this word in his epistles, it is connected with church life. Some churches, unfortunately, are characterised by strife. Fights and splits are exemplary fare, and the world watches and wonders, Is this what Christianity is all about?I prayed all my ministry l ife that God would spare the church I pastored from the discord that leads to a church split. God was gracious and answered that prayer.The next act mentioned is the word Jealous.And its not always a vice. In fact, God is called a jealous God in the Scriptures and even gives as one of His names, Jealous.GNBAnd we are urged to be jealous for Gods honour and for Gods name.DSBut here it is obvious the intention is to speak of selfish jealousy, that attitude which resents the success enjoyed by someone else. This, too, occurs in the church, when one person is asked to do a ministry that someone else wanted, or when one member has an unusual degree of success in business.Then there are Fits of rage.Losing ones temper and blowing a gasket are not excusable because your hair is red or because someone around you is especially irritating or because thats just the way you are. Its a work of the sinful nature, and those that practice outbursts of anger shall not inherit the kingdom of God.Anot her act of the sinful nature in social situations is egoistic ambition.The term used here signifies a mercenary spirit which withholds ministry or service from someone if there isnt enough money in it. Pastors who read speaking engagements solely on the basis of where the larger honoraria are given are guilty of this vice.GNBA cartoon in Leadership ledger years ago showed a Christian musician standing before an adoring audience about to sing a beautiful worship song he had written himself. The caption has him saying something like this The Lord gave me this song, and if anyone uses it without my permission, Ill sue you.DSA spirit of selfish ambition, to be sure. But so is the attitude of a layperson who revoked to serve in the church because it would interfere with his moneymaking ability.The next word is Dissensions.Its a term with strong doctrinal overtones, and refers principally to the introduction of divisive teaching in the church.GNBThe legalists in Galatia were a prime e xample.DSAnd there are many in the church today who are teaching doctrines, some dead false and others just distortions, which keep people from focusing on truths that revolutionise Christ and build up believers.In fact, I believe even solid truth can sometimes be taught in a way that produces dissension. The doctrine of election, for example, is a doctrine I highly value, but if it is not taught guardedly, it can be unnecessarily divisive.The next word (Number 12) is Factions.It goes a step further than dissensions. In fact, it is the natural result of divisive teaching, in that a party spirit develops and the Body of Christ is split into groups-one of which champions a particular teacher or leader, while another champions someone else.GNBPaul experienced this in Corinth, where he chided the church with these wordsOne of you says, I follow Paul another, I follow Apollos another, I follow Cephas as yet another (and this was the super-spiritual group), I follow Christ.Is Christ d ivided? Was Paul crucified for you? Were you baptized into the name of PaulDSI believe cliques are a common manifestation of this vice of factions. Oh, how we need to be careful not to isolate ourselves with our little group of friends Nothing will destroy the spirit of unity in a church more quickly.Young people, this includes you. sometimes youth groups are extremely difficult for new kids to break into because of the cliques that exist. Its an act of the sinful nature.Next Envy is closely related to the earlier concept of jealousy, only this term, in contrast to jealousy, is always negative. It is the grudging spirit that cannot bear to contemplate someone elses prosperity.GNBChrist gave a parable in which some of the workmen complained that the last-hired worker had been over- generously paid. The owner of the vineyard replied, Do you begrudge my kindness?DSThose guilty of envy do indeed.Having examined the social sins that deal with interpersonal relations, lets consider two that are common to imbibing alcohol.Drunkenness is ebullient indulgence in alcohol, which weakens ones rational and moral control over actions and words. There is undoubtedly less excuse for the abuse of alcohol in our society today than even in the Galatian society of the first century, for drinking booze in those days was almost essential, whereas today it is always by choice. No one today has to drink at all-the alternatives are numerous and often more healthy. The simple reason why abuse of alcohol is such a problem today is social pressure. Too many people think theyll stick out like a sore flip over if they ask for a soft drink.But, you ask, cant one drink without abuse? Certainly, and many do. Drinking is not in itself a spiritual issue-drunkenness is-but drinking is certainly a social issue that must be examined carefully by Christian people.Many need to ask the question, Is the minor enhancement of life that moderate use of alcohol provides worth the major lay on the line of abuse that so subtly and frequently results? Remember that those who practice drunkenness will not inherit the kingdom of God.Then he mentions Orgies or carousings which often accompany drunkenness.In fact, rarely, do these occur without alcohol, for the lowering of ones natural inhibitions with alcohol is generally a pre-requisite before most people will even participate in grossly immoral behaviour.GNBFifteen vices have been listed.DSBut then the Apostle adds an et cetera, for in verse 21 he ends his list with the phrase, and the like. What he doesnt want us to do is to think of the acts of the sinful nature just in terms of these 15 vices, with the implication that if you vacate all 15 of these, youve got it made spiritually.These are only representative of the kinds of actions that return from our natural, in-born tendency toward sin.GNBWe need to hear this even if its tough to do so its information from the Word of God here on Word Alive with Dr Derek Stringer. And w e must also evaluate the acts of the sinful nature. And Derek will be suffer in a moment to help us do just that.I just want to take this opportunity to let you know that we are praying for you our listener. If we can be of help spirituality well thats what were here for. Word Alive is not just about giving biblical information but seeing it lead to spiritual transformation. I give you our contact details in just a moment but let me hand the microphone over to Derek Stringer as he wraps up this teaching from Galatians 519 to 21. Over to DerekDSThanks again Brenda.What we find at the conclusion of the Apostles list is a severe warning. I warn you, he says, as I did before, that those who live like this will not inherit the kingdom of God.The first thing we should ask is this To whom is this warning addressed? Well, theres no question that Paul is talking to the professing Christians who were members of the churches of Galatia. most of them were probably genuine believers, but as in any church, there were undoubtedly some who were just going through religious motions.Many of these church members had come to Christ out of paganism, where their lives had been controlled by sinful habits. Some of them had practiced fornication as a religious duty in the pagan temples. Sorcery had been as common as weather forecasting. Naturally, not all of these nasty habits disappeared overnight when they professed faith in Christ. Some struggled with particular sinful addictions, or at least temptations, for some time.I would like to suggest that it was because some of these former pagans were struggling that the Judaizers had been so successful in introducing their legalism into the churches.I can just hear them say, You Galatians have tried grace as a way of conquering your baser instincts but the only sure way of putting a lid on sin is going back under the Law of Moses Paul, of course, disagrees strongly that the Law has any power to conquer such habits, but instead of re iterating what he has already divided up as the real answer (namely the life of grace as it is walked in the power of the consecrated Spirit), he hits them with a stunning warning, namely that the terra firma of God is not going to be populated by people who commit immoral deeds, hate other people, lose their tempers, or get drunk.Now, if youre a normal, intelligent and inquisitive person, you probably are not unstrained to let the matter lie with that simple statement of Pauls theology. For numerous questions encounter ones mind as to the meaning of this severe warning.Does this verse teach that anyone who has ever committed one immoral act or gotten smashed or acted jealously is excluded forever from Heaven?Or rather that those who do such things after conversion are excluded?Or that those who do such things and refuse to repent are excluded?Or that those who practice such things continually are excluded?Probably most of us would tend to choose the latter option, because we ar e anxious to preserve one of our favourite doctrines-the security of the believer. I too agree with the last option, but not for that reason.The Apostle is, in my estimation, fighting the very common tendency to divorce morality from religion.GNBThere are many who feel that whats important is just what people believe, not how they behave.DSOne or two of you may have even thought thats what I believe, for probably no fewer than a dozen times over the past programmes I have stated, We are saved by believing, not by achieving. Yes, I said that, and I believe that, but I never said that behaviour is unimportant-just that it can never save you.Anyone who thinks he can run around on his wife, get drunk at every office party, and practice road rage every night, and still go to Heaven so long as his beliefs are orthodox, has helpless Pauls point regarding our freedom in Christ completely.A Christian should never view his relationship with God as a free shred to sin, but rather as a compul sion to forsake sin. both(prenominal) our beliefs and our behaviour are important to God, and we dare not divorce them.In fact, we cant divorce them, even if we try.GNBWe behave the way we behave because we believe the way we believe.DSI think thats true. If we live sinful lives its because we sincerely dont believe God hates sin and that He will some day strain those who do it. We may say we believe it, but we really dont.Now its very important to pay attention to the verb used in v. 21GNBthose who live like this.DSThe word is in the present extend and is used often to mean practice. This passage says that one whose life is characterized by these acts of the sinful nature will not inherit Gods Kingdom. It doesnt matter what profession he has made. It doesnt matter what aisles he has walked or at what altars he has kneeled. It doesnt matter what spiritual experiences he has had or even whom he may have led to Christ. If these kinds of deeds describe his life-style, then he will not inherit the Kingdom of God, Thus says the Lord. His attitudes and actions contradict the profession he makes that he has experienced the saving grace of God and the transforming power of the Holy Spirit.Would that when we meet one of these severe warnings of Scriptures we would not immediately ask, How does this fit with eternal security?, but rather respond as Jesus disciples did when told that one of them would betray Him, Lord, is it I? Lord, are you talking about me?Finally, I would like to mention just a couple of implications of this severe warning.First, I do not believe anyone whose life is characterised by these acts of the sinful nature has the prodigality of claiming to be a Christian. I am not the one to judge whether hes saved, lost, or just backslidden, but I do say that he has no right to claim hes a child of God when his life denies it. I have had individuals contact me, who were at the time living in gross sin, tell me, Well, at least I know Im a Christian. And I have had to say, Im sorry, but I think thats blasphemy. You have no right to make such a claim while youre living like that.A final implication is that while the entire book of Galatians has emphasised that we cannot inherit Gods kingdom by works, verse 21 says in effect that we can bar ourselves from Gods kingdom by works. Good works, in other words, cant get you into heaven, but works of the sinful nature can send you to Hell.All around us are corruptive influences threatening to drown us in the actions of the sinful nature. But I find hope offered to us in the Word of God.BrendaGNBIn a very similar passage in 1 Corinthians 6 this same Apostle wrote, Dont you know that the wicked will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor priapic prostitutes nor homosexual offenders nor thieves nor the greedy no drunkards nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God. And that is what some of you were. B ut you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God.DSNotice the tense of that verb when he says, And that is what some of you were. Paul would never have written, And that is what some of you are, for Christian adulterer is an oxymoron so is Christian thief and Christian drunk. But the use of the past tense shows that God can turn people around.The greatest thing about Christianity is that a personal relationship with Christ can turn a mans present habits into history. There is no life too gross and too filled with the acts of the sinful nature that Jesus Christ cant make a past tense out of it. The only person irreclaimable is the one whose heart is too proud to seek Gods forgiveness.GNBAre you one who is in need of the warning of this Scripture passage today?DSYes Are you, as one who professes to be a Christian, involved in practicing one or more of these sins listed here? If so, your ultimate concern sho uld not be to debate whether you real

No comments:

Post a Comment