Thursday, March 28, 2019
Platos Apology Essay -- Apology by Plato
Platos self-justification Platos Apology is the story of the trial of Socrates, the charges brought against him and his maintaining of his own innocence end-to-end the process. At the onset of the trial, Socrates appears to challenging the charges, which included corrupting the youth, challenging belief in the gods that were accepted and reveled by the State, and introducing a new religious focus, scarce also belittles his own significance and suggesting that he testament not onset to disprove that he participated in the actions maintained by the court. In essence, Socrates appears intimately self-effacing, and his defense surprises regular(a) his accuser, Meletus. But by the end of the Apology, Socrates becomes almost a different person, demonstrating his own prise while refusing to beg for forgiveness even to save his own life. This view of Socrates presented by Plato demonstrates the difference between a man accused and a man condemned, and in the end, Socrates has nothing to tolerate by providing instruction to the people by dint of his remarks. At the onset of the trial, Socrates recognizes that the original reason for the accusations are not that he himself did not have value or that he was instructing students in a way that had not happened in the past, but that circumstances surrounding the trial had led to the perception that work force like Socrates were challenging the standards of government. Though Socrates suggests that his value for the State was unending through out the process, the fact that his teachings asked the youth to explore their value, their systems of thought, and to question authority was a significant problem for a sometimes wavering State. I commemorate that it was right of Socrates to encourage the youth to think for th... ...h others can begin to earn his wisdom.Socrates suggests that if death is a journey where all must go, then he will simply take that journey, and at the end, spend his time assistin g others in examining their lives. Socrates suggests not only that he accepts the outcome, but also that he himself will welcome the chance to do in death what he was condemned for in life. The completion of this sort of examination on the part of the few or the many is not possible. If a person or nation is to perplex and move forward the process of self-examination will never be complete. The journey of examination in itself could provide the insight needed to leave significant changes in todays moral and political thinking. I think that Socrates examination leads to a scale of Christian ethical values that the United States and much of the world today is lacking.