Tuesday, February 19, 2019

The Arras Medallion Essay -- Art Analysis

The Arras Medallion was issued to register Constantius Chlorus recovery of Britains and the rescue of London in 296 AD . It is the heading of this source criticism to evaluate the medallion and determine its value to the drive of government and society under Diocletian. The source provides valuable insight into how the tetrarchs presented themselves. It leave behind be suggested that the source reveals the tetrarchs promotion of images that portray them as united and equal. In addition there is a sense of militarism and just rule that the tetrarchs where withal keen to promote. Along with corroboration of literary sources and a possible, however slight, workout of individualism makes the sources valuable with regards to tetrarchic propaganda.The deciphered legend on the obverse of the coin (Flavius Valerius Constantius formal Caesar) indentifies the figure as Constantius Chlorus. The inclusion of PTA on the bottom of the reverse side of meat indicates that it was made it Tr ier. Given that he is identified as Caesar the coin can be attributed to anywhere between 293 and 305 AD. However, as the reverse shows a scene of the re-conquest of Britain it was likely commissioned in 296/7 AD . Constantius is seen wearing a laurel wreath and armour and looking to one side. These features along with the wheat beard be key similarities that many tetrarchic coins shared . Indeed the coins of the tetrarchs are so similar in form that without the legend, identification of the individual would be difficult. This was part of the tetrarchs desire to appear united and equal to create counterpoint with the destructive divisions that occurred during the early third century. According to Southern the adoption of Flavius Valerius into his squall was also... ...s an example of the tetrarchic unity being challenged. The source also corroborates the literary level and reveals the desire of the tetrarchs to appear just in rule. Whether the source is an accurate moving -picture show of the reaction to the tetrarchs is another matter entirely. Overall, the Arras medallion proves valuable in the study of Diocletians reign as it provides insight into how the tetrarchs wanted to be perceived.BibliographyCasey, P,J,. 1994 Carausius and Allectus The British Usurpers, Routledge, London, 1994Rees, R., 2004 Diocletian and the Tetrachy, Edinburgh University Press Ltd, Edinburgh, 2004Southern, P,. 2001 The Roman Empire from Severus to Constantine, Routledge, London, 2001Internet resourcehttp//tetrarchy.com/coppermine/(accessed 07/04/2012)

No comments:

Post a Comment